I understand your focus on trans people's safety. However, labeling dissenting views as 'transphobic' without allowing room for dialogue is problematic. This shuts down conversation and increases polarization, leading to resistance because people feel they are being asked to accept beliefs without discussion.

Engaging in constructive dialogue, even with those who initially disagree, is essential for building understanding and support. Advocacy that is perceived as grounded in human rights, science, and empiricism, rather than ideology, fosters broader acceptance and cooperation. This ultimately enhances the safety and acceptance of trans individuals more effectively.